Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | amatoallah ouchen <at.ouchen@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | st: fixed vs random effect model |
Date | Sun, 4 Jul 2010 16:42:30 +0200 |
Good day Stata-listers, I'm apoloziging is the question may seems elementary for many of you, but i really need to check this before going on in my analysis. i'm running a panel data regression and after performing the haussman test the conclusion was that my model is a fixed effect one. The problem is located on my explanatory variables which display week variations, and as it is well known fixed effect model gives weak results in a such case. So should 'i use the random effect instead??? Thanks a lot in advance. Ama. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/