Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Claudia Berg <cberg@gwmail.gwu.edu> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | st: Marginal Effects after Biprobit with Reliable Standard Errors? |
Date | Sat, 29 May 2010 18:44:53 -0400 |
Dear Statalist, I am trying to obtain marginal effects with reliable standard errors after a Seemingly Unrelated Biprobit model. I have tried using the commands "mfx compute, predict()" but Stata warns that it is "unsuitable" for biprobit and imposes the option "nose". I know that the option "force" can be used to obtain standard errors but with no guarrantee that they are reliable. I have refered to the earlier discussion on statalist found at http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/mfx_nose.html which says that: "if diag(vce) shows a large relative difference (say, bigger than 10^-2 for example) the standard errors given by using force will probably be wrong..." I checked the "diagnose(vce)" option for my data and found that for my data the relative difference was about 0.029. Can anyone suggest a way to get reliable standard errors? If I am forced to use "force", how unreliable would the standard errors be? Thank you in advance for any and all advice and comments! Claudia * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/