Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: AW: RE: AW: RE: Correct labeling in egenmore axis()?
From
"Kaulisch, Marc" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: AW: RE: AW: RE: Correct labeling in egenmore axis()?
Date
Wed, 12 May 2010 09:50:44 +0200
Great tip. Thanks.
Marc
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Nick Cox
Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Mai 2010 19:47
An: [email protected]
Betreff: st: RE: AW: RE: Correct labeling in egenmore axis()?
Independently of all this, small offsets for different variables for the same group usually work well.
SJ-7-1 gr0026 . . . . Stata tip 42: The overlay problem: Offset for clarity
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
J. Cui
Q1/07 SJ 7(1):141--142 (no
commands)
tip for graphing several quantities on a continuous axis
Nick
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Cox
Sent: 11 May 2010 18:43
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: AW: RE: Correct labeling in egenmore axis()?
Marc's replies to 1 and 3 shows that what I think abstractly is a good
or bad idea doesn't map onto what he wants concretely. Fair enough.
<lots of details of no interest to almost anyone>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/