Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: pweight question

From   Stas Kolenikov <>
Subject   Re: st: pweight question
Date   Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:47:37 -0500

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Michael I. Lichter
<> wrote:
> The scale of the weights (what they sum to) doesn't tell you whether or not
> they are pweights.

That's not quite right. Properly scaled probability weights should sum
up to the population size. This however is only relevant when you
estimate -total-s. If you run pretty much any other analysis (means,
ratios, proportions, any sort of regressions), then the scale of the
weights cancels out. I would grind my teeth at the pweights that are
scaled to the sample size, and maybe make some mental comments about
the data provider, but won't be bothered very much by this nuisance.

The scaling of the weights begins to matter again with multilevel
data, in which the scaling is known to affect the accuracy of the
variance component estimates.

Stas Kolenikov, also found at
Small print: I use this email account for mailing lists only.
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index