Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AW: st: AW: changes in -xi: xtmixed- command from Stata 10 to 11
From
"Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
AW: st: AW: changes in -xi: xtmixed- command from Stata 10 to 11
Date
Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:04:08 +0200
<>
Ok, additional behind the scenes chatter with Maarten Buis indicates to me
that the majority of users have no problem here, apart myself and Bob
Ploutz-Snyder.
HTH
Martin
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Kit Baum
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. April 2010 16:00
An: [email protected]
Betreff: re: st: AW: changes in -xi: xtmixed- command from Stata 10 to 11
<>
Like Scott Merryman, I have no problem with the xtmepoisson command, using
Stata/11 MP (64-bit Intel) born 20Apr2010. It converges rapidly whether you
use uv and uv2 or c.uv and c.uv#c.uv in the command line.
Kit Baum | Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin |
http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
An Introduction to Stata Programming |
http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata |
http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/