Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: remaining missings after multiple imputation
From
Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: remaining missings after multiple imputation
Date
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:04:44 +0000 (GMT)
--- On Mon, 19/4/10, Anne Jurczok wrote:
> I decided against using ice, since I have different types
> of missings in my dataset (hard and soft missings) and I
> couldn't find any literature about different types of
> missings handled by ice.
It is implicit in the sense that -ice- allows you to specify
an -if- statement. So, you could type something like:
gen byte soft = lnvermgen < .a
ice <varlist> if soft, <other options>
> Not all cases of my dataset are considered for the
> imputation.
Do these observations contain only missing values on
the variables you use for the imputation?
-- Maarten
--------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
--------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/