Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: AW: Heteroskedasticity in Probit Model


From   Mustafa Brahim <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: AW: Heteroskedasticity in Probit Model
Date   Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:40:26 +0800

Thank you Martin appreciate your help. you really made my day


Ismail

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Martin Weiss <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> <>
>
>
> The test tests the null of homoscedasticity, and your results conclusively
> rejects the null.
>
>
>
> HTH
> Martin
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Mustafa Brahim
> Gesendet: Montag, 19. April 2010 08:40
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: st: Heteroskedasticity in Probit Model
>
> Dear Stata users,
>
> I want to check for heteroskedasticity in a Probit model. I used
> hetprob command which gives me the likelihood ratio test as follows:
>
> likelihood ratio test of lnsigma2=0: chi2(10)=40.65 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000.
>
> I am not sure how to interpret this? is the significant chi2 a sign of
> heteroskedasticity or the opposit?
>
>
> I really appreciate your help.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ismail
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index