Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Fixed Effects inconsistency between Correlation and Coefficient Direction

Subject   st: Fixed Effects inconsistency between Correlation and Coefficient Direction
Date   Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:42:34 -0400 (EDT)

I have a question that I cannot seem to find an answer to. I am attempting to use the fixed effects model for research that I am conducting for my dissertation. My committee and I discovered that in certain circumstances the results do not seem logical. For instance, the correlation matrix indicates a positive relationship between two variables and then when we run the Fixed Effects Linear Regression model using the same two variables, the coefficient indicates a negative relationship. I suspect that it may be related to something I read that stated that the fixed effects model has the tendency to drop a significant amount of data in the independent variable when the data is perceived as having a high degree of randomness.

The correlation matrix suggests a positive relationship .2663 and the coefficient correlation indicates a negative -1491. When I run the same variables using the linear regression model with the Mixed Effects variation, all findings suggest a positive relationship. Does anyone know what could be causing this strange occurrence? Any advice or guidance you can provide would be most appreciated.
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index