Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: AW: Reorganization of pael data


From   [email protected]
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: AW: Reorganization of pael data
Date   Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:29:52 -0400

I'm sorry; I didn't know that. I just started to work with data.
I tried it with max this time, it worked out. So thanks a lot!!

Mareike

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, Apr 14, 2010 7:21 pm
Subject: RE: st: AW: Reorganization of pael data


Here it comes:

"The current version of Stata is 11. Please specify if you are using an earlier version; otherwise, the answer to your question is likely to refer to commands
or features unavailable to you."

(http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/statalist.html#stata)

-- and, it might well be added, lead to wasting your time and that of others.

(max) rather than (firstnm) will probably serve in your case.

Nick
[email protected]

[email protected]


No, double checked the spelling.  Maybe the reason is that I'm working
wih an older version of Stata (version 9.2) which doesn't know "firstnm"


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index