<>
What kind of covariates have you included in these models? Over 500 (540/605
to be precise)?
HTH
Martin
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Ekrem Kalkan
Gesendet: Montag, 21. Dezember 2009 16:23
An: [email protected]
Betreff: st: Negative LR test statistic ?
Dear Stata users,
I estimate restricted and unrestricted 3SLS models. I compare these
models with LR test. However, the loglikelihood value of the
restricted model is higher than that of the unrestricted model. To my
knowledge, this is not expected in econometric theory. As the result,
LR-statistics becomes a negative value. Please see my results below.
Can you please comment on this? Thank you.
. lrtest rSLS3_85 uSLS3_85, stats
Likelihood-ratio test
LR chi2(65) = -1311.29
(Assumption: rSLS3_85 nested in uSLS3_85) Prob > chi2 =
1.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Model | Obs ll(null) ll(model) df AIC
BIC
-------------+--------------------------------------------------------------
-
rSLS3_85 | 864 . 34853.08 541 -68624.17
-66048.16
uSLS3_85 | 864 . 34197.44 606 -67182.87
-64297.36
Ekrem Kalkan
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
