[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: Biomarker with lower detection limits

From   "Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: st: Biomarker with lower detection limits
Date   Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:19:43 -0000

Please type in Stata

. findit hurdle model 

[email protected] 

Eduardo Nunez

Thank you so much for your help.

Even though I know the DL, no idea about the biomarker distribution.

I may try all options suggested. However, I would like to know if
Stata perform a hurdle model?

Peter A. Lachenbruch

This sounds like an application for a two-part or hurdle model:
You want to compare the frequency of below detection limit in two
populations (or to a standard) and the continuous variable above the
detection limit.
My inclination is NOT to use imputation - you already know these are
below the detection limit, so why impute something larger than that?
I've been wary of Tobit models since I read somewhere (and I don't
remember where, darn it) that they are quite sensitive to the
normality assumption.

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index