[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From   "Nick Cox" <>
To   <>
Subject   RE: st: REOPROB
Date   Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:00:57 -0000

It is kind of Maarten to presume that, but my comments were on the level of "I see no mention of fixed effects here". 


Maarten buis

--- Maarten buis wrote:
> > In this type of literature the term fixed effects has
> > two very different meanings: 1) the non-random effects
> > of explanatory variables in a random effects model, 
> > 2) a model that only uses information from changes
> > within an level.

--- On Wed, 4/11/09, Tim Waring wrote:
> I actually only need to do number 1 (non-random effects of
> explanatory variables), not number 2 (model that only uses
> information from changes within an level).
> Nick, do you think even this is not possible?

If you look at the STB article introducing this program you
will see that it can estimate fixed effects of type 1. I am
guessing that Nick and Scott are referring to fixed effects 
of type 2.

The STB's are now freely available, so you can download that
article from:
(the article is on pages 23 till 27)

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2023 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index