[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Selection model with multinomial selection AND endogenous regressor

From   Austin Nichols <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: Selection model with multinomial selection AND endogenous regressor
Date   Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:39:27 -0400

margherita Comola <[email protected]> :
You could:
1. Ignore endog of educ and treat selection into formal work vs. other
categories as a probit, so use -heckman-
2. Ignore selection, find an excluded instrument for educ, e.g. some
policy change that induces some people to have more educ than
otherwise identical people, and use -ivregress-
3. Use -cmp- (from SSC) to model the various equations as a system.

The second option is probably best IMHO, in the sense of giving
consistent estimates under various error distributions, but it
requires a very large dataset and good excluded instruments for
reasonable inference.

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 8:01 AM, margherita Comola
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Statalisters,
> I need to estimate a selection model with the following features:
> -the selection equation is a multinomial logit (3 alternatives). As
> usual, the outcome variable is available for one of the alternatives
> only.
> -one of the regressors is endogenous both to the selection AND to the
> outcome equation.
> In particular, the setting is the following: I am estimating a wage
> equation in a setting where wage is available for formal workers only
> (not for informal or non-participants). The selection equation is
> multinomial: non-participants, formal workers, informal workers.
> Education (that can be coded as a dummy or as a continuous variable)
> is endogenous to both equations.
> Any idea?

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index