[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: AW: mfx after xtlogit

From   "Martin Weiss" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: AW: mfx after xtlogit
Date   Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:00:26 +0200


As [XT], p.226, shows, the individual effect is assumed to be drawn from a
normal distribution, but for this particular calculation, all draws from it
are assumed to be zero, i.e. the individual component in the error term is
defined away...


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Filipa de
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. September 2009 16:14
An: [email protected]
Betreff: st: mfx after xtlogit

Dear all,

What exactly means the option "predict(pu0)" in mfx after xtlogit?
What does it imply that the random effect is fixed to 0?

*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index