[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: bug in -xtmelogit-?

From   Jeph Herrin <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: bug in -xtmelogit-?
Date   Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:34:12 -0400

Thanks - that makes sense.

Roberto G. Gutierrez (StataCorp) wrote:
Jeph Herrin <[email protected]> asks:

By accident I coded the following

   xtmelogit depvar var1 || groupid: var2, cov(unstructured) var

Note that var2 is not in the equation, but I have specified it as
a random coefficient. After puzzling over my results for some time
I discovered my error, but I am surprised that -xtmelogit- did not
discover it for me. What exactly was it estimated for the variance
of the coefficient on -var2-? Is this a bug?

Not a bug, but instead something you probably don't want to do statistically.
By leaving -var2- out of the first equation, you estimated the variance across
groups (-groupid-) of the coefficient on -var2-, but you imposed the
constraint that the mean across groups is exactly zero.  It is akin to leaving
main-effects terms out of a model with interactions.

[email protected]
*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index