[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Interpretation of Curvilinear Effects

From   John Antonakis <>
Subject   Re: st: Interpretation of Curvilinear Effects
Date   Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:26:04 +0200

Great!  We're on the same page.



Prof. John Antonakis
Associate Dean Faculty of Business and Economics
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny

Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305

Faculty page:

Personal page:

On 09.06.2009 23:16, Richard Williams wrote:
At 03:00 PM 6/9/2009, John Antonakis wrote:
Hi Richard:

By plotting I meant:

1. Estimate a regression model that is testing specific theoretical

2. Plot the fitted model to help understand the nature of the
interaction (I can work it out from the signs of the coefficients;
however, others may need to see the shape of the data)

That's all I meant; there is nothing data-driven about plotting a fitted
model, right?

Sorry, I understand what you mean now. What I was talking about is situations where people plot the data, and then decide, say, that an x^2 term or a log transformation or whatever is called for. You often hear the suggestion that people plot their data, and there is a lot of merit to that, but under the conditions I describe I think it does offer some of the same sorts of problems that sw does.

Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME:   (574)289-5227
EMAIL:  Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu

*   For searches and help try:
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2022 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index