thanks for the encouragment
------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> I promise that the Stata Journal would not make you choose.
>
> Otherwise, if you're that short of space, cut something else.
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
> Chao Yawo
>
> yeah, I was considering a situation where because of economy of space,
> one has to report only one of the statistic. thanks - cy
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Why choose at all? Together both tell a story.
>>
>> Nick
>> [email protected]
>>
>> Chao Yawo
>>
>> svy: tabulate reports an "Uncorrected chi-square"
>> and "design-based" test, which according to the stata help "corrects
>> for the survey design with the second-order correction of Rao and
>> Scott (1984) and is converted into an F statistic.."
>>
>> in reporting the results of the chi-square, which of these should I
>> chose: the uncorrected chi-square of the corrected design-based
>> version.
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
