Verkuilen, Jay wrote:
(Aside: PF is an antiquated method that belongs on the dustbin of
history as far as I am concerned.)
So what are you advocating instead? ML, which isn't very robust to
weirdness (technical term) in the data? Or something other than FA/PCA?
--
Michael I. Lichter, Ph.D. <[email protected]>
Research Assistant Professor & NRSA Fellow
UB Department of Family Medicine / Primary Care Research Institute
UB Clinical Center, 462 Grider Street, Buffalo, NY 14215
Office: CC 125 / Phone: 716-898-4751 / FAX: 716-898-3536
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
