Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: loglikelihood and loglikelihood ratio


From   [email protected]
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: loglikelihood and loglikelihood ratio
Date   Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:02:07 -0400

I just searched -force- and know what it means. I didn't use it in previous estimation. So I will check the commands again.

Jingjing


Quoting Maarten buis <[email protected]>:


--- On Tue, 17/3/09, [email protected]  wrote:
The previous results is from the estimation of a "7
regions dataset".

Then I use almost the same command to do the estimation of
a "3  regions dataset". The only thing I change is that I
choose first 3 regions of the total 7 regions and also
modify the command that related to the dummy varible. This
time, it gives a negative value.

Are you sure both models A and E refer to the same 3 regions?

Did you specify the -force- option in -lrtest-?

--Maarten

-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Institut fuer Soziologie
Universitaet Tuebingen
Wilhelmstrasse 36
72074 Tuebingen
Germany

http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
-----------------------------------------







*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/





*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index