OK. I'm thinking back to the original senses. I don't think that
Stata
supports that kind of thing directly. Correct? Nick
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk -----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Richard
Goldstein
Sent: 20 February 2009 13:43
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: st: Jackknifing on Stata
nope -- there is actually lots of literature on using grouped, or
delete
"d" jackknife
e.g., see, Efron, B. (1982), _The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and
other resampling plans_, Philadelphia: SIAM (e.g., p. 7)
Efron, B and Tibshirani, R (1993), _An Introduction to the
Bootstrap_, NY: Chapman and Hall (e.g., p149)
Rich
Nick Cox wrote:
My understanding of jackknifing is that it is virtually _defined_ as
leaving each value out in turn and combining all the results to
see what that indicates
about variability. It may be that you want some other cross-
validation
procedure, and well and good, but Stata's jackknifing procedures
will not I think
provide it.
Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk