Yes, this helps! Thanks Maarten and Steven.
Anupit
----- "Steven Samuels" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maarten is correct: -predict(pu0)- gives the predicted probability
> when the intercept is zero. However, zero may not be a plausible
> value. For example: consider an unconditional model Y= logit(P) = a
>
> + ln(2)X, corresponding to OR = 2.0, for a one-unit increase in X.
> If the likely range of probabilities is 0.01 to 0.30, the
> corresponding range of Y is about -4.60 to -0.85. If X > -1, then a
>
> = 0 is not possible.
>
> -Steve
> On Feb 6, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Maarten buis wrote:
>
> >
> > --- On Fri, 6/2/09, Supnithadnaporn, Anupit wrote:
> >> I analyze the data using both -clogit- and -xtlogit fe-
> >> commands. I would like to get the marginal effect of each
> >> independent variables in the model. However, -mfx- command
> >> does not work after both -clogit- and -xtlogit fe-, giving
> >> the error
> >>
> >> predict() expression unsuitable for marginal effect
> >> calculation
> >> r(119);
> >>
> >> Would anyone please suggest me how to get the marginal
> >> effect after running -clogit- and -xtlogit fe-?
> >
> > -mfx, predict(pu0)-
> >
> >>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
