Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: how to deal with a censored and skewed regressor?


From   "Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: how to deal with a censored and skewed regressor?
Date   Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:08:53 -0000

(x - r(min)) / (r(max) - r(min)) 

does not yield missing when r(min) is 0 unless x is missing or r(max) is
also zero. But that's neither here or there. The above is just a linear
rescaling of a variable and will thus leave skewness unchanged. 

Skewness of a regressor is not itself fatal to anything. 

Censoring of a regressor is something to take account of in
interpretation. If you regard such a regressor as error-free, as one
usually does, then I am not clear that procedure need otherwise be
affected.  

Nick 
[email protected] 

mbaier

I tried to transform it according to ln(skewed variable), but my 
regressor has a lots of values at zero, for which ln is not defined. I 
also tried to create an index like I=100*(x-r(min))/(r(max)-r(min)), 
which again leads to many missings (due to many x's being zero).
What can I do?
Besides, do I have to account for the censoring of my regressor? If so, 
what can I do?


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index