[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Lopa Chakraborti <[email protected]> |

To |
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> |

Subject |
st: RE: re: problem using predictnl after obtaining non-linear estimates |

Date |
Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:58:01 -0400 |

Thanks you have pointed me to the right direction. However, I am not using either predict() or xb() functions. Instead, I have: predictnl bod1 = ($K2/($K1-$K2))*exp(-$K1*aggthirdfourthadd)*(exp(-$K2*seconddistadd)-exp(-$K1*seconddistadd)). That said my limited knowledge in programming might also explain why I cannot make the connection. thanks again for your advise ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kit Baum [[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 12:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: st: re: problem using predictnl after obtaining non-linear estimates <> Lopa said I have a general question about predictnl and that is does it evaluate any function as in any NL function of the parameters and some explanatory variables or does it only predict dependent variables as is usually done. [R] predictnl -- Obtain nonlinear predictions, standard errors, etc., after estimation That help indicates that " pnl_exp is any valid Stata expression" so that you may calculate any function for each observation, not just the standard predicted value. In Stata 10 help, When calculating inference-related quantities such as standard errors, pnl_exp is evaluated repeatedly for different values of the model parameters. Therefore, think of predict() and xb() as a means of substituting for the formula of the calculation and not a means of substituting the value of the calculation that is obtained when the model parameters are set to any specific values. For example, . predict double pred_var, predict_options . predictnl newvar = pred_var, se(newvar_se) will give standard errors (newvar_se) equal to zero, since once evaluated, pred_var will contain values that are fixed with respect to e(b). Instead, . predictnl newvar = predict(predict_options), se(newvar_se) will produce what is intended. which states that zero standard errors will result. I have no idea whether it works this way in Stata 8.2. Kit Baum, Boston College Economics and DIW Berlin http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata: http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:

**References**:

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: standard deviation** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: RE: re: problem using predictnl after obtaining non-linear estimates** - Previous by thread:
**st: re: problem using predictnl after obtaining non-linear estimates** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: RE: re: problem using predictnl after obtaining non-linear estimates** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |