st: RE: xtlogit chamberlain sector-fixed effects

 From "Rodrigo Alfaro A." <[email protected]> To <[email protected]> Subject st: RE: xtlogit chamberlain sector-fixed effects Date Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:45:03 -0300

```///

Well, you could add dummies to any problem, but 100 parameters could
give you a nonsense result if your sample size is small. There is a good
paper by Greene that covers this
(http://www.stern.nyu.edu/~wgreene/nonlinearfixedeffects.pdf). Maybe you
will need to find a correspondece between panel and your problem.

I think that your Chamberlian's model refer to -clogit- or -xtlogit,
fe-. A good econometrician that has more than one paper. Anyway, you
should read in the manual the assumptions of that model. In general is a
nice solution for the problem, but it can be implemented only in logit
model. In other words, we know that binary variables are 0 or 1, but we
are not sure that the model behind is logit, probit or any probabilistic
model.

Good luck

Rodrigo.

-----Mensaje original-----
De: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] En nombre de Fardad Zand
Enviado el: Jueves, 23 de Octubre de 2008 12:09 p.m.
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: st: xtlogit chamberlain sector-fixed effects

Dear Listers,

I'm trying to estimate a model using a cross-section dataset: y_ij =
f(x_ij,u_j,e_ij), where y_ij is a binary, x_ij are regressors at the
firm-level (firm i in sector j), u_j is unobservable sector-specific
effects and e_ij are unobservable firm-specific effects. One way to
capture as mush as u_j in the model is to add separate dummies into the
model. But I have around 100 sectors and adding about 100 dummies
doesn't seem to be a good choice. Moreover, I've heard that dummies
can't be added to logistic specifications as they can in OLS models.

Q1: Theoretically, I'm not sure if one can't add dummies to a logistic
regression as she does in an OLS.

Another recommended approach is to put constraints on the log-likelihood
function in order to sweep out the u_j. One way suggested by Chamberlain
(1980) is to condition the log-likelihood function on Sigma(y_ij).

Q2: Is there any advantages for tis approach compared to adding separate
dummies into the model?

Q3: Do you any better, similar approach for this purpose?

I have been recommended to use Stata -xtlogit- FE with constraints to
run the second approach.

Q4: I couldn't figure it out why -xtlogit- and not -logit- as I'm not
using a panel but a cross-section

Q5: How can I define and use the constraint suggested by Chamberlain?
Can you probably post me the code, as I tried many formulations on my
own but neither actually worked out.

Thank you so much for your time and support.

Good luck all,

--
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

********************************************************************************
ADVERTENCIA: La  información  contenida  en  esta  transmisión, y  en  cualquier archivo  adjunto, está  sujeta a reserva legal conforme a la normativa aplicable  al  Banco  Central  de  Chile, y  no  puede  ser usada o difundida  por personas distintas  de  su o sus destinatarios. Si usted ha recibido esta transmisión por error,  por  favor  notifique  inmediatamente al remitente respondiendo por este mismo medio y elimínela de su sistema.
El  Banco Central de Chile no se hará responsable de la exactitud y veracidad de la información contenida en este mensaje, así  como  de su  modificación, copia, divulgación  o  reenvío,  total  o  parcial.   Su  uso  no  autorizado puede ser sancionado de conformidad con las leyes chilenas.
El  Banco  Central  de  Chile  transmite  sus decisiones a través de comunicados oficiales, los  que  pone  a  disposición  del público en su página de Internet: www.bcentral.cl

DISCLAIMER: The information  contained  in  this  email or any attached file, is subject to legal  privilege  pursuant  to the laws and regulations applicable to the Central  Bank  of  Chile , and may not be used or disseminated by any person other  than  its  intended recipients. If you have received this transmission in error, please  notify  the sender immediately by reply to this email address and delete it from your system.
The Central Bank  of  Chile shall not be liable for the accuracy or authenticity of the contents of this message, whether amended, copied, forwarded or disclosed in  any  form, in  whole  or  in part.  Please note that unauthorized use may be penalized  in  conformity  with  the  Chilean law.
The Central  Bank of Chile communicates its decisions by  official releases, and
makes them available to the public in its WebPages: www.bcentral.cl

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
```