# Re: st: Generalized Sign Test

 From Steven Samuels To statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject Re: st: Generalized Sign Test Date Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:21:32 -0400

```Mai-

Tony Lachenbruch pointed out to me that you could have been asking
so I ask again:  What are your data and what do you mean by
calculating "the null value from the estimation period"?

-Steve

On Oct 7, 2008, at 6:50 PM, Steven Samuels wrote:

> -
> I should add that "sign test" and "generalized sign test" are not
> proper terms for what Mai wants to do. Mai wants to test the
> hypothesis in binomial data that the true proportion P = P0, a
> specified value, against H1: P ­ P0. As I stated, Stata's -bitest-
> is designed to do this. I should have added that -ci- will provide
> a confidence interval for the proportion, which would be a useful
> complement to a p-value.
>
> The sign test is a test for location with continuous, not
> categorical, data;  it happens to use the binomial hypothesis test
> for inference.  For example, the sign test may be used to test that
> the median of a distribution is equal to a certain value.  It
> counts the number of observations which exceed the hypothesized
> median and ignores ties; thus, in contrast to Mai's problem, the
> test sample size may be less than the number of observations.  The
> sign test can also test the equality of distributions for paired
> (X,Y) data, by testing the hypothesis that P(X>Y) = 1/2; form Z = X
> - Y and count the number of times Z exceeds 0.  This version also
> ignores ties.  The sign test is relatively simple to do because of
> the connection to the binomial distribution. However the same
> hypotheses can be tested more powerfully with Wilcoxon's signed
> rank sum test.  See: P. Armitage:  Statistical Methods in Medical
> Research, Wiley, 1971, pp 395-397.
>
> Different questions: What are Mai's data and how is a null value to
> be "calculated from the estimation period"?
>
> -Steve
>
>
>
> The sign test is a nonparametric test applied to continuous data
> -bitest-
>
> On Oct 7, 2008, at 3:15 PM, mai7777 wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Is there a way in Stata to perform a generalized sign test which
>> allows the null hypothesis to be different from 0.5. I am using it
>> for
>> an event study and I would like the null to be calculated from the
>> estimation period rather than a standard 0.5.
>> Thanks
>> *
>> *   For searches and help try:
>> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>

Steven Samuels
845-246-0774
18 Cantine's Island
Saugerties, NY 12477
EFax: 208-498-7441

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
```