[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: How to label the value 999999999999

From   "Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: st: How to label the value 999999999999
Date   Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:58:26 +0100

No; this is backward. It's the argument that is problematic, not the

The possible length of the value label, i.e. a string, is not biting
here. It is the fact that you are dealing with a large integer, on which
more is said elsewhere. 

The refusal of -tostring- to produce a string variable in your example
is easy to explain. -tostring- is a wrapper for -string(<real argument>,
"<format>")- with several safety checks and constraints. The format
defaults to %12.0g. Some experiments show that you need a different
format for the conversion of 9...9 (12 digits) to be reversible. 

. di string(999999999999, "%12.0g")

. di string(999999999999, "%13.0g")

. di string(999999999999, "%14.0g")

So, -tostring- will work as desired here so long as a suitable
-format()- is specified. 

[email protected] 

Caleb Southworth

That's right. You cannot have a label that long. So: 

. tostring var, g(var2)
var cannot be converted reversibly; no generate

. tostring var, g(var2) force
var2 generated as str11
var2 was forced to string; some loss of information

Perhaps -mvdecode- would be the way to go. So:

mvdecode var, mv(999999999999)

then, to use codebook or whatever,

mvencode var, mv(999999999999)

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index