[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Steven Samuels <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
Re: st: Test for trend in surveys |

Date |
Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:05:33 -0400 |

There is, to my knowledge, no such thing as test for trend of type Pearson chi-squared. I suspect that �ngel is referring to the Cochran-Armitage test one degree-of-freedom chi square test for trend (A. Agresti, 2002, Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd Ed. Wiley Books, Section 5.3.5).

Let Y be the 0-1 binary outcome variable and X be the variable which contains category scores. One survey-enabled approach is Phil's suggestion: use -svy: logit-.

However -svy: reg- will produce a result closer to that of the Cochran-Armitage test. Why? The Cochran-Armitage test statistic is formally equivalent to an O.L.S. regression of Y on X, with a standard error for beta which substitutes the total variance for the residual variance. The statistic is (beta/se)^2. The total variance is equal to P(1-P), where P is the overall sample proportion. In other words, the standard error is computed under the null hypothesis of equal proportions.

The -svy: reg- command will estimate the same regression coefficient, but with a standard error that is robust to heterogeneity in proportions. In both survey-enabled commands, t = (b/se) has a t distribution with degrees of freedom (d.f.) based on the survey design; t^2 has an F(1, d.f.) distribution.

-Steve

On Sep 30, 2008, at 6:39 AM, Philip Ryan wrote:

Well, the z statistic testing the coefficient on the exposure variable is as

valid and as useful a summary (test) statistic as the chi-square statistic

produced by a test of trend in tables. If you prefer chi-squares, you could

just square the z statistic to get the chi-square on 1 df. And if you prefer

likelihood ratio chi-squares to the Wald z (or Wald chi-square) then the

modelling approach can deliver that also.

Phil

Quoting �ngel Rodr�guez Laso <[email protected]>:

Thanks to Philip and Neil for their advice.

Philip's proposal is absolutely compatible with survey data, but I was

interested in a summary statistic of the type of Pearson chi-squared.

To this respect, Neil puts forward a test (nptrend) that would be

perfect if it allowed complex survey specifications. I believe strata

and clusters are not important because the formula for the standard

error of this nonparametric test (see Stata Reference Manual K-Q page

338) should not be affected by these specifications. But nptrend does

not accept weights as an option, what I think makes it unsuitable for

complex survey analyses.

Angel Rodriguez Laso

2008/9/29 Philip Ryan <[email protected]>:

For a 2 x k table [with a k-category "exposure" variable] just set up a

logistic

dose-response model:

svyset <whatever>

svy: logistic <binary outcome var> <exposure var>

and check the coefficient of <exposure var>, along with its confidence

interval

and P-value.

If you prefer a risk metric rather than odds, then use svy: glm..... with

appropriate link and error specifications.

Phil

Quoting �ngel Rodr�guez Laso <[email protected]>:

Dear Statalisters,

Is there a way to carry out a test for trend in a two-way table in

survey analysis in Stata?

Many thanks.

Angel Rodriguez Laso

*

*--

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Test for trend in surveys***From:*"�ngel Rodr�guez Laso" <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: how to batch print .do files** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: zoom in on a Kaplan-Meier plot (display only a subset of the time axis)** - Previous by thread:
**st: zoom in on a Kaplan-Meier plot (display only a subset of the timeaxis)** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Test for trend in surveys** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |