[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: Treat zeros in logarithms

From	"Verkuilen, Jay" <[email protected]>
To	<[email protected]>
Subject	RE: st: Treat zeros in logarithms
Date	Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:20:04 -0400

Caleb Southworth wrote:

>be bounded by zero and income. But perhaps a willingness<.01 dollars 
>is sufficient? At some point we would have to ask what's the 
>difference between .001 and zero dollars?

References:
- st: Treat zeros in logarithms
  - From: "Mentzakis, Emmanouil" <[email protected]>
- Re: st: Treat zeros in logarithms
  - From: "Austin Nichols" <[email protected]>
- RE: st: Treat zeros in logarithms
  - From: "Nick Cox" <[email protected]>
- RE: st: Treat zeros in logarithms
  - From: "Mentzakis, Emmanouil" <[email protected]>
- RE: st: Treat zeros in logarithms
  - From: Caleb Southworth <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: st: RE: Treat zeros in logarithms
Next by Date: [no subject]
Previous by thread: RE: st: Treat zeros in logarithms
Next by thread: RE: st: Treat zeros in logarithms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread