[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: fixed effect, autocorrelation heteroskedasticity

From   David Jacobs <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: fixed effect, autocorrelation heteroskedasticity
Date   Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:59:57 -0400

Remember that Ghislain wanted within estimation.

I would have suggested -xtpcse- but I read someplace that Beck and Katz do not recommend throwing in dummies to get fixed-effects when estimating with a pcse approach.

Do you have any insight on this? It would be helpful to know more about this.

Dave Jacobs

At 07:32 PM 8/23/2008, you wrote:

David Jacobs replied to Ghislain Dutheil:

> Economists often use -xtgls- and manually enter the dummies for cases (and
> years if you need 2-way fixed effects).
> Another possibility is to use xtreg, fe and cluster on case id.  This will
> correct the t-values for serial correlation, but you probably don't have
> enough cases in each cross-section.  This approach might work if you enter
> less than about 10 explanatory variables, however.
> By the way, the -xtreg, fe- routine in Stata 10 will warn you if you've
> exceeded the limits on the number of explanatory variables when you cluster
> on case id and the matrix is not full rank. But Stata 8.2 will not.

Ghislain didn't make clear how her dependent variable is measured; I
shall assume it's continuous and without bounds.

She reported that in her dataset, N=14 and T=57. If by this, she means
that she only has 14 panel cases measured across 57 time-points
(assuming these are equally spaced), then I'm pretty sure that any
cross-sectional GLS estimates will likely be pretty unreliable as
compared to those reported in OLS-PCSE models. Indeed, this is the
very reason one would fit the latter kind of model to such data.

Nevertheless, I would suggest fitting all three models mentioned by
David to your data, -estout- the model output and then eyeball the
estimates across the columns to judge which model appears closest to
your theoretical expectations.

Hope that helps.

Clive Nicholas

[Please DO NOT mail me personally here, but at
<[email protected]>. Please respond to contributions I make in
a list thread here. Thanks!]

"My colleagues in the social sciences talk a great deal about
methodology. I prefer to call it style." -- Freeman J. Dyson.
*   For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index