[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <[email protected]> |

To |
<[email protected]> |

Subject |
RE: Re: st: RE: RE: Bootstrap and Technical analysis |

Date |
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:12:51 +0100 |

Sorry, Mahmoud, but I think you're missing the key point I made twice in earlier posts -- or perhaps hoping to believe that it can't be true. There is some work on bootstrapping for time series -- but the commands you are using do not implement that. There is some work on t-tests for time series -- but the same comment applies. Independence versus dependence is not a small technical point that can be solved by a trick. If it were, there would not be large areas of statistical science focusing on time series and spatial series. If you apply procedures intended for independent observations to data that are dependent, then P-values are the first to go. The P-values you get are basically garbage. Standard errors are wrong too. This is not well covered in introductory texts or courses, but it is true. Eva's comments do not address this point either. So, as far as I can see what you are doing is in principle wrong. How far that matters in practice will depend on the correlation structure of your time series, on which I naturally have no information. It moves me not a bit that other people may have done what you are proposing. If so, they were wrong too. Correctness in this field is not decided by vote. This is of course not a personal opinion. I've already given a reference to Box, Hunter and Hunter, which explains the point very well. Your reply to Tony Lachenbruch indicated that you have a paired data structure. If so, the thing to do would perhaps be 1. Plot means for one set versus means for the other set. 2. Count the numbers on each side of equality and report the fractions. In other words, descriptive statistics and graphics are what I recommend. Nick [email protected] Mahmoud Abd-El-Aal i am just trying to see how many of the bootstraped samples mean of a certain variable is larger than the mean of another variable, and therefore i need to know from the tests that i presented earlier is it larger or smaller since we reject the null hypotheses: var2-var1=0; Tony, i am assuming they are paired because variable 2 depends on componenets from variable 1 the variables are the log returns of closing prices (var1) and the moving average rules of this return series (var2), I know there is autocorrelation in them, but that is why am using just two forms of processes that could take into account some of this, random walk with a drift and the AR (1) process........ The point is all this has been done before in an academic paper, i tried sending to the authors but no reply......i am totally aware of the problems accompanying this kind of tests but there must be a way around it somehow. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Re: st: RE: RE: Bootstrap and Technical analysis***From:*"Eva Poen" <[email protected]>

**References**:**RE: Re: st: RE: RE: Bootstrap and Technical analysis***From:*Mahmoud Abd-El-Aal <[email protected]>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Egen command** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: How to make Crimson match local macro delimiters in Stata** - Previous by thread:
**RE: Re: st: RE: RE: Bootstrap and Technical analysis** - Next by thread:
**Re: Re: st: RE: RE: Bootstrap and Technical analysis** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |