Thanks. By the way, I mapped you from Joao to Jose before. Sorry about
that.
Nick
[email protected]
Joao Ricardo F. Lima
thanks for the information. I'm with the two articles and will read.
2008/8/7, Nick Cox <[email protected]>:
<stuff>
> In terms of the original question, Jose evidently did not look at
>
> SJ-3-2 pr0009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Speaking Stata: Problems
with
> lists
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N.
> J. Cox
> Q2/03 SJ 3(2):185--202 (no
> commands)
> discusses ways of working through lists held in macros
>
> SJ-2-2 pr0005 . . . . . . Speaking Stata: How to face lists with
> fortitude
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N.
> J. Cox
> Q2/02 SJ 2(2):202--222 (no
> commands)
> demonstrates the usefulness of for, foreach, forvalues, and
> local macros for interactive (non programming) tasks
>
> Under the Stata Journal's 3-year moving window, these papers are
visible
> to all via the Stata Journal website, regardless of whether you or
your
> institution subscribe.
>
> The more recent paper discusses parallel lists (and the demise of
-for-)
> in considerable detail.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
