[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: IV and quantile regression

From   "Austin Nichols" <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: RE: IV and quantile regression
Date   Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:45:31 -0400

Matteo Cominetta and
Sachin Chintawar <[email protected]>:

Usually this naive approach (sticking in a predicted value for the
endog var) gives biased and inconsistent estimates (e.g. when applied
to -probit- or -poisson- or -glm- or what have you).  I believe that
some work has been done on an IV version of quantile regression, but
there is no Stata command that I know of, and there is no consensus in
the literature that I am familiar with on how it should be
implemented. So I don't think it is possible in Stata as of today, but
I would be happy to be proved wrong.

On 8/5/08, Sachin Chintawar <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi
> Though I did not find a command for a two stage quantile regression, One way
> to go through this problem is to run your first stage regression and use the
> predicted values of the first stage in the second stage quantile regression.
> I hope this helps. More comments on using such a technique would be useful.
> Sachin Chintawar
> Research Assistant
> Dept. of Agricultural Economics
> Louisiana State University
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matteo Cominetta
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:34 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: IV and quantile regression
> Dear All,
> I need to estimate a quantile regression model in which some
> (continuous) regressors are endogenous. Is there a Stata command to
> perform a 2SLS procedure in which the second stage is a quantile
> regression?
> I couldn't find it.
> Thanks!
> Matteo Cominetta
> Sussex University
*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index