![]() |
From | "Michael Anthony Carlton" <carlto12@msu.edu> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: SUR and a system of logit models |
Date | Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:48:05 -0400 |
Dear all,
Thanks for your reply.
I actually have more than 2 equations that I am currently running
logistic regressions separately.
My understanding is that estimating them together would increase the
efficiency of the estimates. But is there anything strongly against
doing this instead of estimating a system of equations?
Any other suggestions?
Thanks!
Faye
If there is no STATA procedue, is there SAS procedure?
On 4/26/08, Phil Schumm <pschumm@uchicago.edu> wrote:
On Apr 25, 2008, at 4:53 PM, F. Gao wrote:*
> What to do if I have a system of logit models (binary dependent variables)
and wish to do SUR regression?
> eg: Pr(A=1)=f(x,y), Pr(B=1)=f(x,z)
>
On Apr 26, 2008, at 5:35 AM, Stephen P. Jenkins wrote:
> There is no such approach that I am aware of, as there is no multivariate
logistic distribution.
>
One possible approach is alternating logistic regression:
V. Carey, S. L. Zeger, and P. Diggle. Modelling multivariate binary data
with alternating logistic regressions. Biometrika, 80(3):517–526, 1993.
I am not aware of a Stata implementation.
-- Phil
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
© Copyright 1996–2025 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |