Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: St: How to handle missing observations in the factor-principal component analysis


From   Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   RE: st: St: How to handle missing observations in the factor-principal component analysis
Date   Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:05:53 +0000 (GMT)

--- Simo Hansen <simohansen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then, the problem is that fax and stapler also have missing
> observations. Therefore, I could not imply "ice", could I?

-ice- is explicitly designed to deal with exactly that problem, so yes
you can and should use -ice- in that case.

-- Maarten


-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Department of Social Research Methodology
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Boelelaan 1081
1081 HV Amsterdam
The Netherlands

visiting address:
Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434

+31 20 5986715

http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
-----------------------------------------


      __________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2021 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index