[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: about vs. verinst

From   Alan Riley <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: about vs. verinst
Date   Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:03:42 -0500

Giovanni Vecchi <[email protected]> asked whether -verinst-
is still a valid Stata command:
> with the advent of Stata 10, the commands <about> and <verinst>
> produce the same output. Exactly the same. This does not make sense to
> me. 
> While <about> is still documented in the reference manual, <verisnt>
> is not. Nor is there an entry for <verinst> in the on-line help.
> I'm tempted to conclude that <verinst> has become an out-of-date
> command. Can anyone confirm it?
> I'm running Stata/MP, duly updated.

-verinst- is no longer an officially-documented command in Stata 10.

Many years ago, on old DOS computers, people would sometimes install
Stata in such a way that Stata could not find its ado-files.  We
created a simple command implemented as an ado-file named -verinst-
which people could try to execute to see if Stata could find their

If Stata could find -verinst- and execute it, obviously Stata could
find its ado-files.  If the command was not found, it meant Stata
could not find its ado-files and troubleshooting was necessary.

In modern versions of Stata, the installation routines install
Stata in such a way that we no longer hear about Stata not being
able to find its official ado-files.  Thus, we deemed -verinst- to
no longer be necessary and made it undocumented.  We left around
a simple ado-file for -verinst- so that we wouldn't break anything
in case any users had a call to -verinst- in a do-file.

([email protected])

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index