[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
n j cox <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
Re: st: Algorithm for data management with 3 nested conditions |

Date |
Sun, 16 Sep 2007 16:15:07 +0100 |

I haven't tried to understand this, but small improvements should be possible by using -count- whenever you just want a count _consistently_ using -summarize, meanonly- when it suffices byte variables whenever they suffice Nick [email protected] Tobias Pfaff we are having a problem concerning an algorithm for data management (Stata 9.2). Our current solution has a forvalues loop iterating over every single observation. So far we don't see how we could do it without a loop. The current processing time is tremendous and we would be grateful about any hints. It might be a bit complicated, and you'd have to step a bit into the logic of our program. We have got one dta-file with tick trading data of investment products. To each product we would now like to assign an option price whose tick trading data is in another dta-file. The algorithm should do the following: 1. STRIKE CONDITION: Calculate the strike difference between the product and the option. Look for a minimum of the strike difference. If there is only one minimum, assign this option price to the product and stop. Else, continue. 2. MATURITY CONDITION: Among the options with minima in strike difference, calculate maturity difference between product and option. Look for a minimum of the maturity difference. If there is only one minimum, assign this option price to the product and stop. Else, continue. 3. TRADING TIME CONDITION: Among the options with minima in maturity difference (and consequently in strike difference), calculate trading time difference between product and option. Look for the minimum of the trading time difference. Assign this option price to the product and stop. => For all three conditions, consider only options that have been traded less than one hour ago. Our solution does the following: A) Merge option prices to products over ISIN and trading time. B) Sort chronologically. C) Do a forvalues loop over all observations. For each product, save ISIN, trading time, maturity, and strike in locals and continue with the algorithm. HOW COULD WE AVOID THE LOOP OVER ALL OBSERVATIONS?? // A) sort product_underlying_isin product_trading_date product_trading_time merge product_underlying_isin product_trading_date product_trading_time /// using temp_options.dta // B) Sorting is important! sort product_underlying_isin product_trading_date product_trading_time // C) Choose matching options with criterion cascade gen double product_matched_implied_vola = . local obs = _N forvalues num = 1/`obs' { if (_merge[`num'] == 1) { // Save values for current product local isin = product_underlying_isin[`num'] local product_time = temp_trading_time[`num'] local product_cap = product_cap[`num'] local product_maturity = product_maturity[`num'] // Calculate absolute strike difference quietly replace temp_strikediff = abs(option_exercise_price /// - `product_cap') if (_merge == 2 & product_underlying_isin /// == "`isin'" & _n < `num' & abs(temp_trading_time - /// `product_time') < 3600000) // Break execution of loop if there is no previous option // for a product quietly sum temp_strikediff if (r(N) == 0) continue // CRITERION 1: Look for minimum of strike difference // and flag resp. observations quietly sum temp_strikediff local min = r(min) quietly gen temp_flag_min_strikediff = 1 if (temp_strikediff == `min') // If only one option observation is left break execution of // current loop iteration and assign option vola quietly sum temp_flag_min_strikediff if (r(N) == 1) { quietly sum option_implied_volatility if temp_flag_min_strikediff /// == 1, meanonly quietly replace product_matched_implied_vola = r(mean) in `num' drop temp_flag* continue } // Calculate absolute maturity difference where criterion 1 is met quietly replace temp_maturitydiff = abs(option_maturity - /// `product_maturity') if (_merge == 2 & product_underlying_isin /// == "`isin'" & _n < `num' & abs(temp_trading_time - /// `product_time') < 3600000 & temp_flag_min_strikediff == 1) // CRITERION 2: Look for minimum of maturity difference // and flag resp. observations (fulfilling also crit. 1) quietly sum temp_maturitydiff local min = r(min) quietly gen temp_flag_min_maturitydiff = 1 if (temp_flag_min_strikediff /// == 1 & temp_maturitydiff == `min') // If only one option observation is left break execution of current // loop iteration and assign option vola quietly sum temp_flag_min_maturitydiff# if (r(N) == 1) { quietly sum option_implied_volatility if temp_flag_min_maturitydiff /// == 1, meanonly quietly replace product_matched_implied_vola = r(mean) in `num' drop temp_flag* continue } // Calculate absolute time difference where criterion 2 is met quietly replace temp_timediff = abs(temp_trading_time - /// `product_time') if (_merge == 2 & product_underlying_isin == /// "`isin'" & _n < `num' & abs(temp_trading_time - `product_time') < 3600000 & temp_flag_min_maturitydiff == 1) // CRITERION 3: Look for minimum of time difference and // flag resp. observations (fulfilling also crit. 1 and 2) quietly sum temp_timediff local min = r(min) quietly sum option_implied_volatility if temp_timediff == `min', meanonly quietly replace product_matched_implied_vola = r(mean) in `num' drop temp_flag* } } * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**RE: st: need help destringing a variable** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: xtset -- data with multiple vars for uniquely identifyingindividuals** - Previous by thread:
**st: Algorithm for data management with 3 nested conditions** - Next by thread:
**st: suest with large number of fixed effects** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |