Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: Instrumental Variable and Probit


From   "Austin Nichols" <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: RE: Instrumental Variable and Probit
Date   Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:45:43 -0400

Ralph Bl�thgen <[email protected]>:
Roger's advice is to estimate a model identical to -ivreg- in two
steps, which would produce identical point estimates but incorrect
standard errors.  -ivreg- and -ivreg2- will both produce consistent
estimates, even when the endog var is binary, and -treatreg- offers
greater efficiency if the distributional assumptions are justified.

On 6/21/07, Roger Smeets <[email protected]> wrote:
You could always estimate a first-stage probit separately, then predict
the dependent variable from the estimated coefficients (predict y if
e(sample)) and use the predicted variable as an explanatory variable in
your second stage model.

Roger

-----Original Message-----
From: Ralph
Bl�thgen
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 2:18 PM

Hi to everyone,

I want to estimate a two-stage model by IV. Unfortunately, my endogenous
variable is a dummy.

Does anybody know how to introduce something like a probit model for the
first-stage-regression into ivreg?

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index