|
|  |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: robust with multinomial multilevel (gllamm)
Thanks Maarten,
Do you mean that I can use the robust option?
Sami
From: Maarten buis <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: robust with multinomial multilevel (gllamm)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:46:37 +0100 (BST)
--- stata_user stata_user <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am using the gllamm program to estimate a multilevel multinomial
> model.
>
> I have the folliwing problem:
>
> Without the robust option one of my variables (binary variable) has
> a risk ratio of 2.2 but not significant , with the robust option the
> parameter becomes significant.
That isn't a problem. Robust doesn't necessarily mean larger standard
errors. I believe this is discussed in the User's manual (but I don't
have that at home so I can't check)
Hope this helps,
Maarten
-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Department of Social Research Methodology
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Boelelaan 1081
1081 HV Amsterdam
The Netherlands
visiting address:
Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434
+31 20 5986715
http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
-----------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up
for
your free account today
http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
_________________________________________________________________
Txt a lot? Get Messenger FREE on your mobile.
https://livemessenger.mobile.uk.msn.com/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
