Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: robust with multinomial multilevel (gllamm)


From   Maarten buis <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: robust with multinomial multilevel (gllamm)
Date   Thu, 17 May 2007 19:46:37 +0100 (BST)

--- stata_user stata_user <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am using the gllamm program to estimate a multilevel multinomial
> model.
> 
> I have the folliwing  problem:
> 
>   Without the robust option one of my variables (binary variable) has
> a risk ratio of 2.2 but not significant , with the robust option the
> parameter  becomes significant.

That isn't a problem. Robust doesn't necessarily mean larger standard
errors. I believe this is discussed in the User's manual (but I don't
have that at home so I can't check)

Hope this helps,
Maarten

-----------------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
Department of Social Research Methodology
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Boelelaan 1081
1081 HV Amsterdam
The Netherlands

visiting address:
Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434

+31 20 5986715

http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/
-----------------------------------------


      ___________________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for
your free account today http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html 
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index