Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: an ordinary two-way table


From   "Giovanni Vecchi" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: st: an ordinary two-way table
Date   Sat, 12 May 2007 16:57:19 +0200

Michael,

now tabvals works perfectly. Blame on my Outlook for wrapping the
lines!

Thank you very much.


- Giovanni

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Michael Blasnik
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 3:52 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: st: an ordinary two-way table
> 
> ...
> Actually, I just checked my original email and I did have 
> line 2 below as 3 separate lines in the original ado.
> 
> Michael
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Blasnik" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 9:48 AM
> Subject: Re: st: an ordinary two-way table
> 
> 
> > ...
> > The program apparently wrapped in the emailing at this section:
> >
> >>> syntax varlist( min=1 max=2) [if] [in], values(numlist)
> >>> [MISSing] * if "`missing'"!="" {  local novarlist "novarlist"
> >>> }
> >
> >
> > This should be two lines
> >
> > line 1:
> > syntax varlist( min=1 max=2) [if] [in], values(numlist)  [MISSing]
*
> >
> > line 2:
> > if "`missing'"!="" {  local novarlist "novarlist"}
> >
> >
> > The second line should really be split up given more recent 
> Stata conventions, 
> > as:
> >
> > if "`missing'"!="" {
> > local novarlist "novarlist"
> > }
> >
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index