|  |  | 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: Re: Tests of endogeneity by ivreg2
Dear Torunn
The ivendog command performs the same function as the endog() option  
and the orthog() option in ivreg2, as the ivreg2 help file illustrates:
(Equivalence of DWH endogeneity test when regressor is endogenous...)
        . ivreg2 lwage exper expersq (educ=age kidslt6 kidsge6)
        . ivendog educ
(... endogeneity test using the endog option)
        . ivreg2 lwage exper expersq educ (educ=age kidslt6  
kidsge6), endog(educ)
(...and C-test of exogeneity when regressor is exogenous, using the  
orthog option)
        . ivreg2 lwage exper expersq educ (=age kidslt6 kidsge6),  
orthog(educ)
The hypothesis being tested is that the variable(s) being challenged  
(educ in the above example) could be treated as exogenous in order to  
derive consistent estimates. In the first and second examples above,  
it is treated as endogenous, and the estimated model is contrasted  
with one in which educ is treated as exogenous. The Durbin-Wu-Hausman  
test (see our 2003 Stata Journal paper) compares the IV and OLS  
estimates to determine whether they are 'close enough'. If they are,  
there is insufficient evidence to reject the null. In the third  
example, we estimate the model treating the variable as exogenous,  
and contrast it with a model in which it is endogenous--the same test  
from the opposite perspective, yielding the same test statistic.
This is not the same as the test of overidentifying restrictions  
("Sargan - Hansen"), as you have noted.
The statistics differ with different specifications of instruments  
because the model being estimated takes account of y, X and Z (the  
matrix of instruments). If you vary Z in IV regression you get a  
different set of estimates, and any test statistics based on those  
estimates will differ.
Kit
Kit Baum, Boston College Economics and DIW Berlin
http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata:
http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html
Hello,
Could you please tell me more about the Ivendog test in ivreg2?  
This test
statstic differs with different instruments used, see below. Does a  
high
significance level mean that the variable is correctly  
instrumented? I thought
this was a test of the possible endogeinity of a regressor (whether  
the
regressor is correlated with the error term) and don't understand  
why the
statistics differ with different instruments.
When the equation is exactly identified, the Sargan statistic does  
not tell
anything about the validity of the instrument used, i.e. whether the
instrument is uncorrelated with the error term.
Sincerly,
Torunn Kvinge
. ivreg2 dbrutto dvar dkap (naceand  =  bruttolag2 h_2) if  
bnrlag2==bnr&major==0,noco
Instrumental variables (2SLS) regression
----------------------------------------
                                                      Number of obs  
=    27336
                                                      F(  3, 27333)  
= 28008.10
                                                      Prob > F       
=   0.0000
Total (centered) SS     =  79149.00578                Centered R2    
=   0.7542
Total (uncentered) SS   =  79240.13053                Uncentered R2  
=   0.7545
Residual SS             =  19453.73944                Root MSE       
=      .84
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
--------
     dbrutto |      Coef.   Std. Err.      z    P>|z|     [95%  
Conf. Interval]
------------- 
+----------------------------------------------------------------
     naceand |  -.7821335   .4831546    -1.62   0.105     
-1.729099    .1648322
       dvar1 |   1.102227   .0041356   266.52   0.000      
1.094121    1.110332
        dkap |   1.100465   .0054046   203.62   0.000      
1.089872    1.111057
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
--------
Sargan statistic (overidentification test of all  
instruments):           3.604
                                                   Chi-sq(1) P-val  
=   0.05764
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
--------
Instrumented:  naceand
Instruments:   bruttolag2 h_2 dvar1 dkap
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
--------
. ivendog naceand
Tests of endogeneity of: naceand
H0: Regressor is exogenous
    Wu-Hausman F test:                  1.43488  F(1,27332)  P- 
value = 0.23098
    Durbin-Wu-Hausman chi-sq test:      1.43502  Chi-sq(1)   P- 
value = 0.23095
. ivreg2 dbrutto dvar dkap (naceand  =  bruttolag2 ) if  
bnrlag2==bnr&major==0,noco
Instrumental variables (2SLS) regression
----------------------------------------
                                                      Number of obs  
=    32422
                                                      F(  3, 32419)  
= 32376.15
                                                      Prob > F       
=   0.0000
Total (centered) SS     =  95034.69372                Centered R2    
=   0.7475
Total (uncentered) SS   =  95234.76917                Uncentered R2  
=   0.7481
Residual SS             =  23991.92712                Root MSE       
=      .86
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
--------
     dbrutto |      Coef.   Std. Err.      z    P>|z|     [95%  
Conf. Interval]
------------- 
+----------------------------------------------------------------
     naceand |   -3.34325   .5468789    -6.11   0.000     
-4.415113   -2.271388
       dvar1 |   1.100445   .0038692   284.41   0.000      
1.092862    1.108029
        dkap |    1.10401    .005045   218.83   0.000      
1.094122    1.113898
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
--------
Sargan statistic (overidentification test of all  
instruments):           0.000
                                                 (equation exactly  
identified)
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
--------
Instrumented:  naceand
Instruments:   bruttolag2 dvar1 dkap
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
--------
. ivendog naceand
Tests of endogeneity of: naceand
H0: Regressor is exogenous
    Wu-Hausman F test:                 34.48155  F(1,32418)  P- 
value = 0.00000
    Durbin-Wu-Hausman chi-sq test:     34.44916  Chi-sq(1)   P- 
value = 0.00000
. ivreg2 dbrutto dvar dkap (naceand  =  h_2 ) if  
bnrlag2==bnr&major==0,noco
Instrumental variables (2SLS) regression
----------------------------------------
                                                      Number of obs  
=    27336
                                                      F(  3, 27333)  
= 28031.26
                                                      Prob > F       
=   0.0000
Total (centered) SS     =  79149.00578                Centered R2    
=   0.7544
Total (uncentered) SS   =  79240.13053                Uncentered R2  
=   0.7547
Residual SS             =  19437.07382                Root MSE       
=      .84
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
--------
     dbrutto |      Coef.   Std. Err.      z    P>|z|     [95%  
Conf. Interval]
------------- 
+----------------------------------------------------------------
     naceand |    -.13545   .5909122    -0.23   0.819     
-1.293617    1.022717
       dvar1 |   1.102789   .0041444   266.09   0.000      
1.094666    1.110911
        dkap |   1.099174   .0054448   201.87   0.000      
1.088502    1.109845
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
--------
Sargan statistic (overidentification test of all  
instruments):           0.000
                                                 (equation exactly  
identified)
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
--------
Instrumented:  naceand
Instruments:   h_2 dvar1 dkap
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
--------
. ivendog naceand
Tests of endogeneity of: naceand
H0: Regressor is exogenous
    Wu-Hausman F test:                  0.02136  F(1,27332)  P- 
value = 0.88380
    Durbin-Wu-Hausman chi-sq test:      0.02136  Chi-sq(1)   P- 
value = 0.88379
-----End Original Message-----
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/