|
|  |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: Jackknife with clustered survey data
Thank you for your response. I will take a look at the papers you
suggested. I have read several papers discussing variants of the jackknife
designed for handling WOR sampling and/or unequal selection probabilities.
Most notably:
Berger YG, Skinner CJ. A jackknife variance estimator for unequal
probability sampling. J R Statist Soc B 2005; 67(Part 1): 79-89.
In general, these suggest that the jackknife as implemented in Stata's -svr-
commands and SUDAAN is not appropriate for all multistsage sampling designs.
In fact, my concern is that the jackknife is only applicable with equal
selection probabilities at the first stage or with stratified data where the
probability of selection may vary across strata but is constant among PSUs
within each stratum. Since the data I am working with are not stratified,
this presents a problem.
One further question. If the jackknife were appropriate for use with
unequal probability sampling at the first stage, then would this not imply
that the bootstrap could be used instead? I assume that the sampling
weights would need to be suitably rescaled for each replicate sample.
From: "Stas Kolenikov" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: Jackknife with clustered survey data
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:42:54 -0500
If you are interested in technical details, you should check Krewski &
Rao and Rao & Wu original papers:
http://www.citeulike.org/user/ctacmo/article/785133,
http://www.citeulike.org/user/ctacmo/article/774883, or Shao's review:
http://www.citeulike.org/user/ctacmo/article/1036970. The way I am
thinking about the resampling methods, and jackknife especially, is
that they are taking small steps around the maximum of the likelihood,
trying to get a feel of the surface around that max, and then it does
not matter much whether the weights/unequal prob of selection are used
or not: it would change the structure of those small steps, but won't
change things conceptually.
On 3/24/07, James Shaw <[email protected]> wrote:
I have a question about variance estimation with survey data. The -svr-
commands in Stata can be used to analyze complex survey data with
replication methods such as the jackknife. I am working with a
multi-stage
sample of the US population. The first-stage sampling was performed
without
replacement (WOR). Since the sampling fraction was small (<10%), I should
be able to analyze the data as though sampled with replacement (WR). The
first stage units were also selected with unequal probabilites using a
probability proportional to size (PPS) algorithm. The second-stage units
(survey respondents) were selected randomly, and there is no
stratification.
I have read (in the manual for SUDAAN) that the jackknife variance
estimator
is applicable when:
(1) WR sampling is used at the first stage or the sampling fraction is
small
in every first-stage stratum.
(2) WR or WOR sampling is used at subsequent stages.
(3) Sampling is performed with equal or unequal probabilities of selection
at both the first and subsequent stages.
I thought that the jackknife assumes WR sampling AND equal probabilities
of
selection. Can anyone tell me why the jackknife would still be applicable
when the first stage sampling was done using PPS (with unequal selection
probabilities in a single first-stage stratum)? Thanks!
--
Stas Kolenikov
http://stas.kolenikov.name
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
_________________________________________________________________
Get a FREE Web site, company branded e-mail and more from Microsoft Office
Live! http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
