Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: marginal effects for ivprobit


From   [email protected]
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: marginal effects for ivprobit
Date   Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:08:17 +0100

You can try: 
1) user-written command -mfx2- from http://fmwww.bc.edu/RePEc/bocode/m extending official command -mfx- (I tried and seemed to work, not sure about how much "good" std. errors are)
2) user-written command -divprob- from http://fmwww.bc.edu/RePEc/bocode/i implementing Amemiya Generalized Least Squares (AGLS) estimators (no robust std. errors) --- if you don't find this one, write me off the list and I will send it to you
Please don't ask me what AGLS is.
Nicola

At 02.33 26/01/2007 -0500, Matt D Mitchell wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I am trying to obtain marginal effects on ivprobit.  
>
>As I understand it, I need to use the post-estimation command mfx, predict(p).  "mfx" alone will not work (it does not give the marginal effects, I believe).  When I use the predict(p) command, however, Stata reports that the expression is unsuitable for calculating standard errors.  I know I can force it, but Stata says this may not be recommended.  Is it okay to use force if the relative difference is very small?   
>
>Any recommendations on how I can obtain the marginal effects of an ivprobit and good standard errors?  
>
>Much appreciated,
>
>Matt 

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index