Statalist The Stata Listserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: Stata 8 and 9

From   Silvia Mendolia <>
Subject   Re: st: RE: Stata 8 and 9
Date   Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:47:45 +1100

Thank you very much! This explains the differences...

Thank you


Scott Merryman wrote:

The integration method has changed. From -help whatsnew8to9- :

" 2. New features have been added to the maximum-likelihood estimators
that do not have closed-form solutions and require numeric evaluation of the
likelihood. These estimators include xtlogit, xtprobit, xtpoisson,
xtcloglog, xtintreg, and xttobit.

a. The likelihood may now be approximated using adaptive
Gauss-Hermite quadrature (the new default) or nonadaptive quadrature (the
previous default). Adaptive quadrature substantially increases the accuracy
of the approximation, particularly on difficult problems such as data with
large panel sizes or data with a large variance for the random effects."


-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:owner-] On Behalf Of Silvia Mendolia
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 5:49 PM
Subject: st: Stata 8 and 9

Hello everybody,

I know this seems a very silly question....

I am running the same regression (xtprobit) on the same sample on 2
different computers. One has Stata 8 and the other has Stata 9.
Is it possible to have slightly different results?

I thought it was impossible, but I can't find any other explanation...
The coefficient are differebt from the 3rd dec digit, but anyway...

Any ideas?

Thank you,


* For searches and help try:

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2023 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index