RE: st: RE: aweight option in kdensity

 From "vora n" <[email protected]> To [email protected] Subject RE: st: RE: aweight option in kdensity Date Sat, 16 Sep 2006 20:18:40 -0700

```Thank you very much, Ben.
I really appreciate it.

Yes, the graphs look the same now.

Best regards,
Vora

```
```From: "Ben  Jann" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: st: RE: aweight option in kdensity
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 22:23:17 +0200

Vora wrote:
> If I do:
>
> [1]
> .kdensity income
>
> Then the default kernal is Epanechnikov
> and the default bandwidth is the "optimal"
> bandwidth (silverman).
>
> ----------------------
> If I do:
>
> [2]
> .kdens income
>
> Then the default kernal is Epan2
> and the default bandwidth is silverman.
> [In your paper, equation 28 and equation 29
> are actually the same thing?]
>
> ----------------------
> So if I want kdens to provide the same graph
> as the default kdensity then I should do:
>
> [3]
> .kdens income, k(e)
>
> ----------------------

[Formula 28 is a special case of formula 29. Formula
28 is formula 29 for the gaussian kernel.]

Graphs [1] and [3] should look different - but not too different. There
are several differences between -kdensity- and -kdens-. Among them are:

1. -kdens- uses binned data whereas -kdensity- uses the raw data. This
causes slight differences in the estimates.

2. -kdens- uses a version of the "optimal of Silverman" that takes into
account the canonical bandwidth of the kernel function. -kdensity- does
not do this adjustment (it always uses a gaussian scaling). Gaussian and
epanechnikov have different canonical bandwidths, so the bandwidth
estimates used in [1] and [3] will differ (not very much, though).
Here's an example:

. sysuse auto, clear
(1978 Automobile Data)

. kdensity price, nograph

. di r(width)
605.64238

. kdens price, k(epanechnikov) nograph
(n2() set to 74)

. di r(width)
599.61225

. kdens price, k(gaussian) nograph
(n2() set to 74)

. di r(width)
605.64238

3. The default in -kdens- is to return 512 estimation points (or _N if
_N<512). -kdensity- returns 50.

4. The range of estimation points is set differently.

If you feel that these points do not explain the differences in your
graphs then maybe do something like

. kdensity income, gen(at d1) nograph
. kdens income, k(e) bw(`r(width)') at(at) gen(d2) nograph
. line d1 d2 at

Do the two estimates still look different?

ben

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
```
_________________________________________________________________
��ͧ�ѹ����Ţ�д����к��������� MSN 8 http://join.msn.com/?
page=features/junkmail page=features/junkmail *
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/