|
|  |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: RE: xtgls, p(h) versus xtreg, re robust cluster()
Vincenzo,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Vincenzo Lombardo
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 10:47 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: xtgls, p(h) versus xtreg, re robust cluster()
>
> dear all,
> i am using panel data; i have a question on gls and robust
> command. do you know what is the difference between using
> xtgls, p(hetero), that is groupwise heteroskedasticity, and
> using xtreg, re robust with or without the cluster() option?
You might want to check the FAQs. The following one is helpful and I
think indirectly answers your question:
http://stata.co.uk/support/faqs/stat/xtgls_rob.html
--Mark
Prof. Mark E. Schaffer
Director
Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation
Department of Economics
School of Management & Languages
Heriot-Watt University
Edinburgh EH14 4AS UK
44-131-451-3494 direct
44-131-451-3296 fax
http://www.sml.hw.ac.uk/cert
> In both case, the estimator used should be the GLS, but I do
> not understand what is the difference between using the two
> different commands (xtgls, p(h) or xtreg, re robust).
> the coefficients given by the two approaches, indeed, results
> different, sometimes only slightly, but most of the time the
> difference quite substantial.
> thanks a lot..
>
> --
> Vincenzo Lombardo
> University of Sussex, Dept. of Economics University of Napoli
> Parthenope, DSE
> 12 Canfield Road
> BN2 4DN Brighton - UK
> tel. (UK):++44(0)7765991711
> tel. (ITALY):++393284164302
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
