Statalist The Stata Listserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: interpreting marginal effects of poisson

From   "Scott Merryman" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: interpreting marginal effects of poisson
Date   Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:32:51 -0500

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:owner-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Cunningham
> Question:  The coefficient on sr is -.6870002, and it is the variable
> of interest.  Am I correct in the following interpretations:
> Q1.  The constant (_cons) represents the log of the mean number of
> sex partners for the reference cell, which in this case is Black men
> living in homes where parents are not married (hhd1=1 if biological
> parents are married).  Since exp{.5387156)=1.7138, we see that on the
> average these men have 1.7 sex partners at this point in their
> lives.  Is this the correct interpretation?

Holding all other variables constant.

> Q2.  The hhd1 variable reflects the state of the family in which the
> Black male lives.  As we move from hhd1=0 to hhd1=1, the log of the
> mean decreases by .7, which means that the number of sex partners
> gets multiplied by exp{-0.300639)=0.740345.  This means that Black
> males with married biological parents have 25% fewer sex partners
> than their counterparts whose parents are not married.  Is this the
> correct interpretation?

Yes, holding all other variables constant.

> Q3.  The sr variable is continuous.  It is the ratio of eligible
> Black males (of a certain age range) to eligible Black females (of
> like age range) at the state level, and will take on a value from as
> low as 0.3 to 2.5.  I am unsure of how to interpret the marginal
> effect of a change in the sex ratio ("sr") on sex partners.  Am I
> correct that a one unit increase in the sex ratio causes recent sex
> partners for Black males to fall by 50%?  If so, what is a "one unit"
> when we are talking about a continuous random variable?  Is it a one
> unit increase in the standard deviation?  I've been unable to find
> this information from my reference books, and do not currently own
> the Stata book on categorical variables.  But if anyone can provide
> basic help here, I'd appreciate it.

One unit change would be increasing the sex ratio by +1.  Perhaps the
marginal effects would be of more interest than the factor change.  Or
calculate the change in number of sex partners for a discrete change in sex
ratio that is of interest. 

While you are waiting for "Regression Models for Categorical Dependent
Variables Using Stata" to arrive, you might check to see if a library near
you has J. Scott Long's "Regression Models for Categorical and Limited
Dependent Variables"


*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index