[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
RE: st: RE: RE: Re: manipulating matrix elements
Well, if this little pet project of mine ever turns into a paper, I'll
be sure to let you guys know. But I've always been partial to REVERSE
alphabetical order, myself... ;-)
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:56:39 +0100 (BST)
From: Maarten buis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: RE: st: RE: RE: Re: manipulating matrix elements
- --- Nick Cox <email@example.com> wrote:
According to the published style
rules, Maarten's extra * operator should be presented
Who am I to argue with published style rules, though, I kinda
with surrounding spaces.
like not to add spaces around the * operator and add spaces around
the + operator. It helps me to visually keep track of which operation
is carried out first.
Steve: Now you have to make Maarten and myself co-authors
on your paper(s) from this project.
I can live with that!
Buis, Cox and Vaisey sounds good to me. Alphabetism rules KO!
between 1/2/2006 and 31/3/2006 I will be
visiting the UCLA, during this time the
best way to reach me is by email
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow
Caroline H. and Thomas S. Royster, Jr. Fellow
Department of Sociology
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
200 Hamilton Hall (CB #3210)
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
* For searches and help try: