Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Thanks => graph twoway bar horizontal vs. graph hbar


From   "Austin Nichols" <austinnichols@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Thanks => graph twoway bar horizontal vs. graph hbar
Date   Sat, 4 Mar 2006 17:02:37 -0500

"Didn't work" is less than informative.  The solution as provided does work.
At the risk of violating the norms on reposting, I will repeat:

The addition of
  relabel(3 " " 6 " " 9 " ")
as a suboption of over() ** doesn't ** work.  But this does:
  relabel(3 "`: di char(160)'" 6 "`: di char(160)'" 9 "`: di char(160)'")

On 3/4/06, Hiroshi Maeda <hmaeda1@uic.edu> wrote:
> Thank you for your help, Drs. Nichols & Cox; you have solved my
> problems. Austin, I actually tried the -relabel- suboption inside -over-
> but it did not work, as you pointed out. I wonder why. I feel the
> -relabel- suboption should have solved my problem #2. Am I missing
> something or is this a problem in Stata? ---Hiroshi

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2020 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index