[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Kit Baum <[email protected]> |

To |
[email protected] |

Subject |
st: Re: log transformations of dependent and independent variables |

Date |
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 07:36:08 -0400 |

This kind of specification (log Y vs log X) is a constant elasticity model (see mfx, eyex) in which the coefficients represent the effect of a percent change in X in terms of percent changes of Y. If you leave some variables untransformed (including dummies) then those coefficients are semi-elasticities (d ln Y / dX) in which you examine the effect of a one unit change in X in terms of percent changes of Y (see mfx, eydx). You may have reason to believe that a unit change in some (non-dummy) Xs has a proportional effect on Y. An obvious example is a log trend model, ln Y = a + b t; each unit of time changes Y by approximately b percent (rather than b units of Y, as would be the case without logs).

Kit Baum, Boston College Economics

http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html

On Sep 7, 2005, at 2:33 AM, Chriswrote:

yes, this is a common thing to do. wage regressions are a good example.=20

economists usually take the log of the dependent variable (wages). and=20

then some regressors (such as education) typically enter the equation=20

linearly -- including some dummy variables like race or sex dummies.=20

while other regressors (such as parents' income) typically enter in log=20

form.

chris

* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**st: comparison of diagnostic procedures** - Next by Date:
**st: levelsof for many categories without sorting** - Previous by thread:
**st: comparison of diagnostic procedures** - Next by thread:
**st: levelsof for many categories without sorting** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |